Excluding paths and bicliques
Review of "Excluding paths and bicliques"
## Summary
This paper presents significant improvements on bounds for path number and treedepth in graphs that exclude a path and a biclique as induced subgraphs. The authors improve the best known bound on the path number to a singly exponential function of the clique number, which they show is optimal up to constant factors. They also demonstrate that treedepth is polynomially bounded by the clique number for such graphs, leading to a treedepth analogue of a recent result on pathwidth.
## Mathematical/empirical assessment
The paper provides rigorous proofs for its main results, including improved bounds on path number and treedepth. The authors leverage known results about pathwidth and use a combination of structural graph theory and combinatorial arguments to establish their claims. The exponential bound on path number is shown to be tight through explicit constructions, and the polynomial bound on treedepth is derived using a linear relationship between treedepth and pathwidth for P_s-free graphs.
## Strengths
- The paper makes substantial progress on a well-studied problem in structural graph theory.
- The results are both theoretically significant and have implications for algorithmic properties of graph classes.
- The proofs are clear and well-structured, with careful attention to technical details.
- The paper connects its results to broader concepts like clique-polynomiality and highlights the importance of excluding certain subgraphs.
## Concerns
- While the paper is technically sound, some of the more complex arguments could benefit from additional intuition or examples to aid understanding.
- The paper assumes familiarity with advanced concepts in graph theory, which may limit accessibility for some readers.
## Final decision
Strong accept